Volume 1, Issue 2 (Spring 2018)                   Func Disabil J 2018, 1(2): 57-64 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rafatifard M, Shahali S, Mansour Sohani S. Validity and Reliability of Persian Version of COMI-Neck Questionnaire in Iranian Patients with Chronic Neck Pain. Func Disabil J. 2018; 1 (2) :57-64
URL: http://fdj.iums.ac.ir/article-1-98-en.html
1- MSc Student, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1039 Views)
Background and Objectives: Chronic neck pain in various ages is one of the important causes of occupational disability which has imposed huge costs on health services. Therefore, developing a valid and reliable instrument to obtain information about patients with neck pain seems necessary. The present study was conducted to examine the psychometric properties of COMI-Neck questionnaire in Iranian patients with chronic neck pain.
Methods: In this study, in order to examine reliability (test-retest and internal consistency), the Persian version of The Core Outcome Measures Index for the neck (COMI-Neck), was completed using convenience sampling method among 100 patients with chronic neck pain attending rehabilitation clinics in Karaj city. In order to examine validity, FRI, NDI and SF-36 questionnaires were also completed by participants. Internal consistency, reliability, discriminate validity and construct validity were analyzed using SPSS 20 and statistical tests.
Results: The ICC test results for scores of 5 indices including pain, daily activities, adaptability to existing symptoms, quality of life, recreational and social activities in COMI-Neck, showed that very high validity of the questionnaire with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.89. There was strong correlation between the total score of COMI-Neck and the total score of FRI (P<0.05). Also, a strong correlation existed between the total score of COMI-Neck and NDI total score (P<0.05). Strong and reverse correlations were observed between score of all scales of COMI-Neck and the total score of SF-36 (P<0.05).
Conclusion: The Persian version of The Core Outcome Measures Index for the neck (COMI-Neck) showed good validity and reliability in evaluation of outcome measures among Iranian patients with chronic neck pain.
Full-Text [PDF 294 kb]   (525 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Professional education and practice
Received: 2018/05/8 | Accepted: 2018/07/25 | Published: 2018/10/29

References
1. Aker, P. D., Gross, A. R., Goldsmith, C. H., & Peloso, P. (1996). Conservative Management of Mchanical Neck Pain: Systematic Overview and Meta-Analysis. Bmj, 313(7068), 1291-1296. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1291] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Ansari, N. N., Naghdi, S., Eskandari, Z., Salsabili, N., Kordi, R., & Hasson, S. (2016). Reliability and validity of the Persian adaptation of the Core Outcome Measure Index in patients with chronic low back pain. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 21(6), 723-726. [DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2016.07.022] [PMID]
3. Bombardier, C. (2000). Outcome Assessments in the Evaluation of Treatment of Spinal Disorders: Summary and General Recommendations. Spine, 25(24), 3100-3103. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00002 [DOI:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00003]
4. Borghouts, J. A., Koes, B. W., Vondeling, H., & Bouter, L. M. (1999). Cost-of-illness of Neck Pain in The Netherlands in 1996. Pain, 80(3), 629-636. [DOI:10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00268-1]
5. Damasceno, L. H. F., Rocha, P. A. G., Barbosa, E. S., Barros, C. A. M., Canto, F. T., Defino, H. L. A., & Mannion, A. F. (2012). Cross-cultural Adaptation and Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the Brazilian-Portuguese Lnguage. European Spine Journal, 21(7), 1273-1282. [DOI:10.1007/s00586-011-2100-3] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Deyo, R. A., Battie, M., Beurskens, A. J. H. M., Bombardier, C., Croft, P., Koes, B., ... & Waddell, G. (1998). Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain Research: a Proposal for Standardized Use. Spine, 23(18), 2003-2013. [DOI:10.1097/00007632-199809150-00018] [PMID]
7. Fankhauser, C. D., Mutter, U., Aghayev, E., & Mannion, A. F. (2012). Validity and Responsiveness of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the Neck. European Spine Journal, 21(1), 101-114. [DOI:10.1007/s00586-011-1921-4] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Genevay, S., Cedraschi, C., Marty, M., Rozenberg, S., De Goumoëns, P., Faundez, A., ... & Mannion, A. F. (2012). Reliability and Validity of the Cross-Culturally Adapted French Version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in Patients with Low Back Pain. European Spine Journal, 21(1), 130-137. [DOI:10.1007/s00586-011-1992-2] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Mannion, A. F., Boneschi, M., Teli, M., Luca, A., Zaina, F., Negrini, S., & Schulz, P. J. (2012). Reliability and Validity of the Cross-Culturally Adapted Italian Version of the Core Outcome Measures Index. European Spine Journal, 21(6), 737-749. [DOI:10.1007/s00586-011-1741-6] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Mannion, A. F., Elfering, A., Staerkle, R., Junge, A., Grob, D., Semmer, N. K., ... & Boos, N. (2005). Outcome Assessment in Low Back Pain: How Low Can You Go?. European Spine Journal, 14(10), 1014-1026. [DOI:10.1007/s00586-005-0911-9] [PMID]
11. Manocchia M, Bayliss MS, Connor J, Keller SD, Shiely JC, Tasai C, et al. SF-36 Health Survey Annotated Bibliography: Second Edition (1988-1996). Boston, MA: The Health Assessment Lab, New England Medical Center
12. Mohammadi, H. R., Azimi, P., Zali, A., & Montazeri, A. (2015). An outcome Measure of Functionality and Pain in Patients with Low Back Disorder: A validation Study of the Iranian Version of Core Outcome Measures Index. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery, 10(1), 46. [DOI:10.4103/1793-5482.151511] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Monticone, M., Ferrante, S., Maggioni, S., Grenat, G., Checchia, G. A., Testa, M., ... & Mannion, A. F. (2014). Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for the neck. European Spine Journal, 23(4), 863-872. [DOI:10.1007/s00586-013-3092-y] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Mousavi, S. J., Parnianpour, M., Montazeri, A., Mehdian, H., Karimi, A., Abedi, M., ... & Hadian, M. R. (2007). Translation and Validation Study of the Iranian Versions of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Spine, 32(26), E825-E831. [DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815ce6dd] [PMID]
15. Qiao, J., Zhu, F., Zhu, Z., Xu, L., Wang, B., Yu, Y., ... & Qiu, Y. (2013). Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI). European Spine Journal, 22(12), 2821-2826. [DOI:10.1007/s00586-013-2761-1] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Razavi, D., & Gandek, B. (1998). Testing Dutch and French translations of the SF-36 Health Survey among Belgian angina patients. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 51(11), 975-981. [DOI:10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00089-4]
17. Schellingerhout JM, Virage AP, Heymans MW, Kores BW, Henrico C, Tarweed, CB, Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review, Quality Life Res .2012; 21(4): 659-70. [DOI:10.1007/s11136-011-9965-9] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Taft, C., Karlsson, J., & Sullivan, M. (2004). Performance of the Swedish SF-36 version 2.0. Quality of Life Research, 13(1), 251-256. [DOI:10.1023/B:QURE.0000015290.76254.a5] [PMID]
19. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2007). Quality Criteria Were Proposed for Measurement Properties of Health Status Questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34-42. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012] [PMID]
20. White, P., Lewith, G., & Prescott, P. (2004). The core outcomes for neck pain: validation of a new outcome measure. Spine, 29(17), 1923-1930. [DOI:10.1097/01.brs.0000137066.50291.da] [PMID]
21. Zweig, T., Mannion, A. F., Grob, D., Melloh, M., Munting, E., Tuschel, A., ... & Röder, C. (2009). How to Tango: A Manual for Implementing Spine Tango. European Spine Journal, 18(3), 312-320. [DOI:10.1007/s00586-009-1074-x] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Function and Disability Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb