Volume 1, Issue 1 (Winter 2018)
Func Disabil J 2018, 1(1): 21-30 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hasanvand M, Torabinezhad F, Abolghasemi J, Eslami M. A comparison of Speech Duration in Cochlear Implant and Normal Hearing Elementary School Students in the Imitation and Reading Tasks. Func Disabil J 2018; 1 (1) :21-30
URL: http://fdj.iums.ac.ir/article-1-27-en.html
URL: http://fdj.iums.ac.ir/article-1-27-en.html
1- Speech and Language Pathologist, Department of Speech and Language Pathology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Speech and Language Pathology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Speech and Language Pathology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
Abstract: (3214 Views)
Abstract Farsi
Background and Objectives: Excessive duration is one of the suprasegmental features in cochlear implant children. Regarding the importance of the normal rate of speech in transferring the intonation and clarity of speech, the present study aims at comparing word and sentence duration in cochlear implant and normal hearing children in imitation and reading tasks.
Methods: The present descriptive-analytical study was performed on 30 elementary school cochlear implant children versus 30 normal hearing children. Voice recording was done in a silent room. The Persian-speaking subject was asked to utter “/sælam/ (hello)” and “/Ɂemruz nemiyad/ (He won’t come today)” with the following moods and emotions: statement, question, exclamation, with happiness and with sadness. Then, they were asked to do the same task imitating the voice which had been recorded earlier. Data recording was done using Praat software and data analysis was done by SPSS software.
Results: The average duration in cochlear implant children in two modes of imitating and reading a word showed a significant difference with that of children with normal hearing (P < 0.001). Moreover, in both groups, the average duration of reading the word was less in comparison with imitating the word. Also, the average duration in cochlear implant children in two modes of imitating and reading a sentence showed a significant difference with that of children with normal hearing (P< 0.001). In the cochlear implant group, the average duration of imitating the sentence was less than the average duration of reading the sentence, whereas in the normal hearing group, the average duration of reading the sentence was less than the average duration of imitating the sentence.
Conclusion: The average duration in cochlear implant in all modes (word imitation, word reading, sentence imitation, sentence reading) was more than normal hearing children, which results in abnormal intonation in these children. According to the present study, imitation cannot cause a decrease in duration and consequently, does not result in more natural intonation. Hence, it is probably not a proper therapeutic method.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Speech Therapy
Received: 2017/03/28 | Accepted: 2017/06/5 | Published: 2017/10/29
Received: 2017/03/28 | Accepted: 2017/06/5 | Published: 2017/10/29
References
1. Werner, L. A. (2007). Issues in human auditory development. Journal of communication disorders, 40(4), 275-283. [DOI]
2. Coelho, A. C., Brasolotto, A. G., Bevilacqua, M. C., Moret, A. L. M., & Júnior, F. B. (2015). Hearing performance and voice acoustics of cochlear implanted children. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology, 82(1), 70-75. [DOI]
3. Abbasian Nik, Z., Hassanzadeh, S., & Ghobaribonab, B. (2013). Effectiveness of Exercising on Short Term Memory of Deaf Children with Cochlear Implant. Journal of Eceptional Children, 13(1), 26-33 [Article]
4. Ashoori, M., Hasanzadeh, S., & Pourmohamadreza Tajrishi, M. (2013). Speech intelligibility in children with cochlear implant, with hearing aids and normal hearing. Journal of Rehabilitation, 14(3), 8-15. [Article]
5. Shankar, T. (2015). Cochlear Implantation: My Experience. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 4(98), 16315-16319. [DOI]
6. Wang, D. J., Trehub, S. E., Volkova, A., & van Lieshout, P. (2013). Child implant users’ imitation of happy-and sad-sounding speech. frontiers in psychology, 4, 1-8. [DOI]
7. Roohparvar, R., Bijankhan, M., Hasanzadeh, S., & Jalaie, S. (2010). The acoustic analysis of voice onset time in cochlear implanted children and normal-hearing controls. Journal of Audiology, 19(1), 39-49. [Article]
8. Jafary, N., (2012). Comparing the formant frequencies of three Persian long vowels produced by cochlear-implanted and normal-hearing children. Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences, 1(1), 1045-1053. [Article]
9. Chin, S. B., Bergeson, T. R., & Phan, J. (2012). Speech intelligibility and prosody production in children with cochlear implants. Journal of communication disorders, 45(5), 355-366. [DOI]
10. Angelocci, A. A., Kopp, G. A., & Holbrook, A. (1964). The vowel formants of deaf and normal-hearing eleven-to fourteen-year-old boys. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 29(2), 156-170. [DOI]
11. Snow, D. (2001). Intonation in the monosyllabic utterances of 1-year-olds. Journal of Infant Behavior and Development, 24(4), 393-407. [DOI]
12. Nakata, T., Trehub, S. E., & Kanda, Y. (2012). Effect of cochlear implants on children’s perception and production of speech prosody. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(2), 1307-1314. [DOI]
13. Hide, O., Gillis, S., & Govaerts, P. (2007). Suprasegmental aspects of pre-lexical speech in cochlear implanted children. Paper presented at the Interspeech. [Article]
14. Bochner, J. H., Snell, K. B., & MacKenzie, D. J. (1988). Duration discrimination of speech and tonal complex stimuli by normally hearing and hearing‐impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84(2), 493-500. [DOI]
15. Lenden, J. M., & Flipsen, P. (2007). Prosody and voice characteristics of children with cochlear implants. Journal of communication disorders, 40(1), 66-81. [DOI]
16. Jafary, N., Yadegari, F., & Torabineghad, F. (2014). Comparison of duration of persian vowel in children using cochlear implant with normal hearing children Journal of Speech and Language Pathologist, 1(1), 62-69. [Article]
17. Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation: Cambridge University Press. [Article]
18. Mardani, N., Safaeyan, S., Tavakoli, Z., Sobhani, D., & Ghaemi, H. (2014). The effect of speech sample duration on determination of habitual pitch in 18-30 years age women. Pajouhan Scientific Journal, 12(3), 12-19. [Article]
19. Ishi, C. T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2008). Automatic extraction of paralinguistic information using prosodic features related to F0, duration and voice quality. Speech communication, 50(6), 531-543. [DOI]
20. Nikravesh, M., Torabinezhad, F., Ghorbani, A., & Keyhani, M. R. (2012). Intonation and duration curve in Persian interrogative sentences. Bimonthly Audiology-Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 21(1), 54-61. [Article]
21. Kord, N., Shahbodaghi, M. R., Khodami, S. M., Nourbakhsh, M., & Jalaei, S. (2013). Investigation of acoustic correlation of intonation and intelligibility of speech in children with cochlear implant and comparison with normal hearing children. Modern Rehabilitation, 6(4),38-43 [Article]
22. Clark, A. (2007). Acoustic Correlates of Linguistic Prosody in the Speech of Children with Cochlear Implants: A Study in Comparison with Typical-hearing Peers: ProQuest. [Article]
23. Vandam, M., Ide-Helvie, D., & Moeller, M. P. (2011). Point vowel duration in children with hearing aids and cochlear implants at 4 and 5 years of age. Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 25(8), 689-704. [DOI]
24. Uchanski, R. M., & Geers, A. E. (2003). Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: a comparison with normal-hearing age-mates. Ear and hearing, 24(1), 90S-105S. 10.1097/01.AUD.0000051744.24290.C1
25. O'Halpin, R. (2010). The perception and production of stress and intonation by children with cochlear implants. University of London. [Article]
26. 26. Osberger, M. J., & Levitt, H. (1979). The effect of timing errors on the intelligibility of deaf children’s speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66(5), 1316-1324. [DOI]
27. Nikravesh, M., Aghajanzade, M., (2011). Speech intonation in Persian declarative sentences, Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences, 7(4), 7. [Article]
28. Nikravesh, M. (2010). speech prosody in normal adult Farsi speakers. iran university of medical science. [Article]
Contact Information
All the work in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons
ATTRIBUTION-NONCOMMERCIAL-SHAREALIKE 4.0
INTERNATIONAL International License.
Tehran Province, Tehran, District 3, Mirdamad Ave, Nezam Ave, School of Rehabilitation Science
Tel: +98 21 22228051-2 Ext: 180
Fax98 21 22220946
All the work in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons
ATTRIBUTION-NONCOMMERCIAL-SHAREALIKE 4.0
INTERNATIONAL International License.