Volume 3, Issue 1 (Continuously Updated 2020)                   Func Disabil J 2020, 3(1): 179-184 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sedighi A S, Mirzajani A, Jafarzadehpur E, Abolghasemi J. Color Vision in the Gas Station Workers of Isfahan City: A Quantitative Analysis With the Farnsworth D15 Color Test. Func Disabil J 2020; 3 (1) :179-184
URL: http://fdj.iums.ac.ir/article-1-139-en.html
1- Department of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , mirzajani.a@iums.ac.ir
3- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 904 kb]   (621 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1065 Views)
Full-Text:   (790 Views)
1. Introduction
Petroleum products, including gasoline, are widely used in the industry. Research shows that these products affect the nervous system directly and cause disorders [1]. Most of these products, including gasoline, are lipophilic and volatile at room temperature. Because of this property, they tend to attach or adhere to high-fat tissues, such as brain tissue and myelin. This property poses a risk to health [2].
Petroleum products (such as gasoline) at low or medium concentrations can cause transient symptoms in the central nervous system, such as headache and dizziness. At high concentrations, they can cause disturbances in consciousness, respiratory failure, circulatory system problems, or even death in some cases [1].
Research to date has shown that these products cause changes in various parts of the visual system, such as the lens, retinal layers, and optic nerve. Also, the neurological damage caused by chronic or acute occupational exposure to petroleum products can cause acquired color blindness, including yellow-blue or green-red color blindness [2]. Visual dysfunction can indicate neural changes in the peripheral system. Since color vision deficiency is probably the result of damage to ocular structures, it is possible to diagnose color vision deficiency before patients are aware of functional damage [3].
The employees of gasoline stations are exposed to petroleum products in long work shifts, thus, they are exposed to vapors emanating from gasoline materials by breathing in air. These vapors are also absorbed by the eyes [3].
Oil-rich countries or oil-producing countries are among the most important target communities for these disorders. Besides, some research has been done on the effects of gasoline on visual functions, including color vision [3, 4]. 
However, no research has investigated the occupational exposure to gasoline in Iran, because of the country’s population, different climatic conditions, gasoline consumption, and the number of fuel stations as an important target community for this field of research. Therefore, it is of great importance to evaluate color vision in the community of Iranian fuel stations in Isfahan City as one of the metropolises of the country, which is world-famous and has a lot of traffic [5, 6]. The results can be suitable for explaining warnings and preventive planning regarding job protection.

2. Methods
This cross-sectional study was performed on the gas station workers of Isfahan City, all of whom were male. Participants were divided into two 40-people groups of exposure and non-exposure (members of the fuel sales department).
The desired tests were performed on each person. Tools are needed to perform these tests and examinations. First, the far and near visual acuity of the person was taken using the Snellen chart with and without glasses. The best vision of the person (ie, the row of the Snellen chart that was seen by the person) was recorded as far and near visual acuity in the questionnaire. Then, people with near and far visual acuity of 8/10 or better with and without correction were selected. Also, all of the examinees had a work history of more than five years and no history of any underlying diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, and thyroid problems; they were also taking no medications. Moreover, the participants did not have a history of eye diseases, such as cataracts, glaucoma, or any other diseases, all of which were recorded in the examination form.
The next step was to perform the Farnsworth D15 color vision test. Color vision tests, particularly the Farnsworth D15, are sensitive to color vision defects caused by toxic substances. Although the use of more than one color vision test may help diagnose color vision defects, the Farnsworth D15 has been more sensitive than other color vision evaluation tests [7].
This test consists of 15 dots with different colors in terms of saturation. The examinee must arrange and write the order of the numbers behind them. There was no time limit for performing this test. The Color Confusion Index (CCI) is calculated by dividing the sum of the distances between the colored beads that the examinee arranged in the Farnsworth D15 color vision test by the sum of the standard bead distances (correct arrangement), which is a number equal to 56.4. The final number called CCI was obtained and interpreted quantitatively [8]. The minimum value of CCI is one; values higher than one indicate color vision impairment. Each eye was examined separately in high mesopic light conditions and at a distance of 50 cm from the person because the acquired color vision defect can be monocular and asymmetric [9].
The obtained data were statistically analyzed with SPSS, version 22. Besides, descriptive statistical indicators, such as mean table and standard deviation were used to describe the data. The normal distribution of data was confirmed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Then, the independent t-test was used to evaluate and compare the mean and standard deviation of the exposure and non-exposure groups. The significance level of the tests was considered 0.05.

3. Results
This study examined the color vision of the right and left eyes in 80 men. The mean age and work experience of the group exposed to gasoline were 47.95 years and 19.68 years, respectively; in the group not exposed to gasoline, these values were 37.80 years and 12.10 years, respectively.
Table 1 shows the central indicators and the dispersion of age and work experience in gas station workers with and without gasoline exposure. There was a statistically significant 10-year age difference and about seven years of work experience difference between the two groups. Thus, we investigated the confounding effect of age and work experience on the color vision variable.




Table 2 shows the average index of right eye color impairment in gas station workers with and without gasoline exposure. The average CCI of the right eye was 1.485 and 1.129 in the exposed and nonexposed to gasoline groups, respectively.



The right eye CCI was compared between the exposed and nonexposed to gasoline groups, using the independent t-test. The value of the test statistic was 81.31, and the value of P was less than 0.001 (less than 0.05). So the right eye CCI significantly differs between the two study groups.
Table 3 shows the mean CCI of the left eye in gas station workers with and without gasoline exposure. The average CCI of the left eye was 1.533 and 1.147 in the group exposed to gasoline and the group not exposed to gasoline, respectively.




The left eye CCI was compared between the two groups of exposure and non-exposure to gasoline, using the independent t-test. The value of the test statistic was 9.555, and the value of P was less than 0.001 (less than 0.05). So the left eye CCI significantly differs between the two study groups.
The two groups of exposure and non-exposure to gasoline differed in the mean age and work experience. Therefore, the confounding effect of age and work experience on the CCI of the right and left eye were examined using the analysis of covariance. No distorting effect was observed, considering the P values that were equal to 0.556 and 0.436 for age and work experience, respectively. Consequently, age and work experience were not distorting variables, and no significant relationships existed between these variables and CCI. Although the average age and work experience differed between the two groups, the lack of distorting effect confirmed the significant relationships obtained owing to exposure to gasoline in gas station workers.

4. Discussion
This study investigated the effect of exposure to gasoline on workers at fuel stations in Isfahan City. The results showed that the group exposed to gasoline significantly suffered from color vision impairment.
Previous studies have also evaluated the color vision changes due to occupational exposure, using the Farnsworth D15 color vision test. The present study found that exposure to gasoline in workers at gas stations in Isfahan caused color vision defects. Also, a study by Gang et al. in Japan, 2003, revealed color vision impairment and color vision deficiency in workers who were exposed to a combination of organic solvents, compared with the control group [1]. This is consistent with the results of the present study on color vision.
Also, the color vision disorder obtained in this study is consistent with the results of Chong et al., 2006. These researchers investigated the acquired color vision in workers at a large petrochemical distillery in Australia. The authors evaluated color vision at the low, medium, and high concentrations of gasoline, using the Farnsworth D15 color vision test. Besides, research has shown that even chronic exposure to the low levels of organic solvents can increase the rate of color vision impairment, resulting in acquired color vision deficiency. The nervous system is the first target organ for the toxic effects of gasoline and solvents, and the lack of color vision is the first sensitive sign of destructive neurotoxicity [2].
In Siluria’s study, the result of color vision deficiency is similar to the result of the present study. A 2012 study in Brazil examined the relationship between the color vision and non-color vision of gas station workers who were exposed to organic solvents. Color visual impairment in workers was more than in the control group; this is similar to the present result on color vision impairment [4].
In 2012, Costa et al. assessed the color vision of 25 workers at a gas station, compared with a control group. The values of CCI in the experimental group were higher than the control group, indicating color vision deficiency in workers [10].
Similar results of the present study in terms of the effect of gasoline on the development of acquired color vision defects have been observed in other studies that have evaluated occupational exposure to substances, such as manganese, gasoline, mercury vapor, and organic solvents [11, 12]. The findings of various studies and the present study on the lack of color vision in the field of occupational exposure show that contact with petroleum products, such as gasoline, negatively affects color vision and can lead to impaired color vision.

5. Conclusion
According to the results of the present study, the chronic occupational exposure of workers at gas stations in Isfahan to gasoline products can harm color vision and cause color vision defect.

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

 This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences. (Code: IR.IUMS.REC.1399.249).

Funding
The paper was extracted from the MSc. thesis of first author  at Department of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran.

Authors' contributions
General design, data collection, analysis, and discussion:   Asieh Sadat Sedighi; Data analysis: Ali Mirzajani; General design and data presentation: Jamileh Abolghasemi; Discussion: Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur.

Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.

References
  1. Gong Y, Kishi R, Kasai S, Katakura Y, Fujiwara K, Umemura T, et al. Visual dysfunction in workers exposed to a mixture of organic solvents. Neurotoxicology. 2003; 24(4-5):703-10. [DOI:10.1016/S0161-813X(03)00034-2]
  2. Lee EH, Eum KD, Cho SI, Cheong HK, Paek do M. Acquired dyschromatopsia among petrochemical industry workers exposed to benzene. Neurotoxicology. 2007; 28(2):356-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuro.2006.05.005] [PMID]
  3. Neto AD, Andrade MJ, de Oliveira AR, Fernández-Calvo B, dos Santos NA. Chronic occupational exposure to low levels of organic vapors can affect color vision and contrast sensitivity. Psychology & Neuroscience. 2017; 10(4):414-27. [DOI:10.1037/pne0000105]
  4. Lacerda EM, Lima MG, Rodrigues AR, Teixeira CE, de Lima LJ, Ventura DF, et al. Psychophysical evaluation of achromatic and chromatic vision of workers chronically exposed to organic solvents. J Environ Public Health. 2012; 2012:784390. [DOI:10.1155/2012/784390] [PMID] [PMCID]
  5. Statistical Center of Iran. Isfahan Statistical Yearbook.Tehran: Statistical Center of Iran; 2012.
  6. Iranian Student’s News Agency. Existence of 970 polluting industrial units in Isfahan [Internet]. 2014 [Updated 2014]. Available from: http://www.isna.ir/fa/news/93040603529/
  7. Betancur-Sánchez AM, Vásquez-Trespalacios EM, Sardi-Correa C. Impaired colour vision in workers exposed to organic solvents: A systematic review. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2017; 92(1):12-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.oftal.2016.05.008] [PMID]
  8. Geller, AM. A table of color distance scores for quantitative scoring of the Lanthony Desaturate Color Vision test. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2001; 23(3):265-7. [DOI:10.1016/S0892-0362(01)00139-8]
  9. Lee EH, Paek D, Kho YL, Choi K, Chae HJ. Color vision impairments among shipyard workers exposed to mixed organic solvents, especially xylene. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2013; 37:39-43.  [DOI:10.1016/j.ntt.2013.02.005] [PMID]
  10. Costa TL, Barboni MT, de Araujo Moura AL, Bonci DM, Gualtieri M, de Lima Silveira LC, et al. Long-term occupational exposure to organic solvents affects color vision, contrast sensitivity and visual fields. PloS One. 2012; 7(8):e42961. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0042961
  11. Anger WK. Neurobehavioral testing of chemicals: impact on recommended standards. Neurobehavioral Toxicology & Teratology. 1984; 6(2), 147–53. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1985-19651-001
  12. Lucchini R, Albini E, Cortesi I, Placidi D, Bergamaschi E, Traversa F, et al. Assessment of neurobehavioral performance as a function of current and cumulative. Occupational lead exposure. Neurotoxicology. 2000; 21(5):805-11. [PMID]
 
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Optometry
Received: 2020/10/1 | Accepted: 2020/10/1 | Published: 2020/12/29

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

 

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb